Forums
By its nature, relevant subject matter may involve personal accounts of health or psychological effects. To encourage sharing on an equitable basis, any observed instance of disrespect, trolling or commercial intent will be subject to appropriate moderation.
Update
The forums are now closed but visitors may access all prior posts. Additional information, related to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) in general, may be found under the other page headings.
How to Join
Although anyone can read the Forums, you must register to post content. If you wish to do this, please let us know via the Contact form so we can temporarily disable blocking. An email will then be sent stating that you have 48 hours to register. Once received, select one of the seven categories of interest below, then “Add Topic” and follow the prompts. Subscriptions can be cancelled at any time via the Contact form.
Although this platform is primarily directed toward conditions within Australia, there are no geographical restrictions upon joining in. Daily statistics show 50 to 150 visits originating from dozens of Countries
Does anyone know what, if any, political parties have a stated policy to limit public exposure to EMR? They would certainly get my vote.
I heard The Greens accepted $680,000.00 from the electrical trade unions in Victoria right at the time microwave-emitting utility meters were being forced upon every household in the State. I wonder if that is why they seem uncharacteristically silent on an environmental issue of such obvious concern and magnitude.
With State and Federal elections coming up, maybe it is time for supporters of all parties to ask some serious questions.
The Health Australia Party has been working with Stop Smart Meters Australia to develop policies that protect people from the negative impacts of EMR. https://www.healthaustraliaparty.com.au. Not sure why they have an image of wind turbines on their website. Is that for or against? Certainly the Greens are about the worst party you can vote for if you are EHS and I am no fan of the major parties where every elected member has to toe the party line. How on earth can they represent their EHS constituents under those conditions?
Great idea except we don't know who the candidates for the federal election will be yet.
I formulated this:
Dear Federal Candidate
How do you know when a politician is lying? Their mouth is moving. One approach I like to use in order to overcome this is to craft my questions in such a way that they cannot figure out whether I am for or against. So let's say I want to know if they plan to relax gun laws. I'm not going to say, "People are being killed left, right and centre by guns. Your party isn't going to relax gun laws, is it?" To have a hope of getting the truth out of them, I'd ask, "What is your party's stance on the current gun laws?" Poor liar doesn't know which way to jump. Refuse to be drawn into elaborating on your views until he's answered the question. Then educate him on why he should or shouldn't be taking that stance.
The good news is that a political party called Nø5G Party is currently being formed. The Constitution is not yet ready but once it is we will need 500 members (at least) so we can register with the AEC. Hopefully political parties will be formed all over the world united under the same umbrella of stopping 5G (and the harmful 2,3 and 4G too). Stay tuned.
You are not alone. According to experts, over 35% of the world’s population feels some form of unwanted reaction to EMR exposure. Additionally, everyone is susceptible to induced biological abnormalities that may not manifest perceptibly for years or even decades.
